#cost per task

Tutorials, deep dives and product notes — built for developers.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol: Same Day, Half the Price, a Lower Ceiling

OpenAI shipped GPT-6 Sol 90 minutes after Claude Opus 5.5, at half the token price. Artificial Analysis ran both on the same tests: Sol is cheaper to any index score up to about 44, then runs out of headroom. Every benchmark, both effort ladders and the real bill.

· 2.8K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra: Equal on Coding, Worlds Apart on Cost

Opus 5.5 matches GPT-6 Astra on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for roughly 40% of the cost per task, with 5x cheaper cache reads. Astra keeps uncontested leads in science, maths and gated offensive security — and OpenAI says it is harder to monitor.

· 2.3K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1: Does the $4 Tier Beat the $10 Flagship?

Opus 5.5 wins eight of the nine benchmarks Anthropic publishes against Fable 5.1 at 2.5x lower token price - but four of those margins sit inside the disclosed error bars. Includes the HAProxy same-task test, the 16-0 research-report result and the one-way thinking-block handoff.

· 1.7K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

Claude Opus 5.5 Review: Fable-Class Results at 40% Less Cost

Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 matches Fable 5.1 on most work at $4/$20 per million tokens: 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 1,846 GDPval-AA Elo, and 40% lower cost per task than Opus 5. Full benchmark table with footnotes, real tester results, the four breaking API changes, and where GPT-6 Astra still wins.

· 1.4K views · Abdeladim Fadheli

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5: The $0.15 Disruptor Meets Anthropic's $5 Flagship

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins 5 of the 15 benchmarks it shares with Claude Opus 5 — by an average of 1.94 points, while undercutting it by up to 41.7× on output price. Opus 5's 10 wins average 10.19 points. Full vendor data, community test reports, pricing math, charts and a routing verdict.

· 3.6K views